Hi
Can anybody provides me meta data for each domain of MDG 8.0?
Hi
Can anybody provides me meta data for each domain of MDG 8.0?
Hello Experts,
I have already come accross many definitions regarding MDG Customer UIs. I would like to understand what the difference is between
For the 2. point - all I know that customer UI is similar to the bp transaction, and customer like UI is similar to the xd* transactions (so in the first case BP partner is created originally, and if configured, customer too; but in the second case only customer data is created). Both CR type CUST1P1 or CUSTL1P1 type are included here?
I've already searched many places, but could you please help me what is the essential difference/relation between the above definitions?
Kind regards,
Tamas
Hello Experts,
I am reading the SAP How-To Guide: Extend the MDG Business Partner - Overview (http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70e2b3a7-88e4-2f10-3bb8-9ba64fe99be7?QuickLink=index&…) document and I came accross an interesting statement: "Using the MDG UIs a business partner is always created." Also by checking the system it seems to me inevitable to create a business partner too when I'm creating a customer, no matter which UI type I'm using (Customer or Customer like UI), becaues MDG is always using the CVI settings. I think it would be a problem for my customer, since previously they have been using bp and xd01 transaction totally independently from each other, a customer creation in xd01 didn't automatically triggered the creation a business partner too.
Does it mean that now I have to explain the customer that the they will be creating business partners during customer creation no matter they want it or not?
Is there any way to avoid it?
Kind regards,
Tamas
Hello Experts,
When I'm using customer like UI, there is a dropdown list for account group selection in the change request, but only those fields are available here which I have assigned in the "Number assignment from bp to customer" transaction (CVI settings). So I would like to use here 3 fields (ship-to, sold-to, bill-to). The problem is that for internal number range assignment I can only assign one of these account groups in the mentiond transaction (CVI settings), the other 2 cannot be assinged because of conflicting keys.
How can I make my MDGC user to be available to choose from all the 3 account groups available in ECC? It seems to me that it's impossible.
Kind regards,
Tamas
Hi ,
I am initializing the AD_POSTAL entity for business partner using BAdI IF_EX_USMD_RULE_SERVICE2~DERIVE method.
This Badi method gets triggered when the maintenance window is loaded for the first time but the default values for attributes of AD_Postal entity which I am setting using the Badi is not reflected on the UI .
However when I press the return key or try to set manually for one of the attributes of AD_POSTAL entity all the default values which has been set earlier using the Badi gets updated on the UI .
I am facing the same issue even when i tried updating this entity with the enhancement in feeder class.
Any clue regarding this Issue .
Here is my code :
**** *******************************************
Creating Data Reference for AD_POSTAL
**** *******************************************
**** Initializing attributes of AD_POSTAL entity ***********************************************************************************
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'BP_HEADER' of structure <ls_data_ad_postal_new> to <lv_system_new>.
<lv_system_new> = lv_bp_header.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'ADDRNO' of structure <ls_data_ad_postal_new> to <lv_system_new>.
<lv_system_new> = gs_temp_key_addr. " Address Number Generated from FM NUMBER_GET_NEXT
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'REF_POSTA' of structure <ls_data_ad_postal_new> to <lv_system_new>.
<lv_system_new> = 'DE'.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'city1' of structure <ls_data_ad_postal_new> to <lv_system_new>.
<lv_system_new> = 'Berlin'.
***********************************************************************************
INSERT <ls_data_ad_postal_new> INTO TABLE <lt_data_ad_postal_new>.
CREATE DATA lr_data_struc LIKE LINE OF <lt_data_ad_postal_new>.
lo_struct_data ?= cl_abap_structdescr=>describe_by_data_ref( p_data_ref = lr_data_struc ).
CLEAR: lt_attribute.
LOOP AT lo_struct_data->components ASSIGNING <lf_component>.
INSERT <lf_component>-name INTO TABLE lt_attribute.
ENDLOOP.
"************************write the data************************************************
TRY.
io_write_data->write_data(
EXPORTING
i_entity = 'AD_POSTAL'
it_attribute = lt_attribute
it_data = <lt_data_ad_postal_new> ).
CATCH cx_usmd_write_error. " Error During Write Access RETURN.
ENDTRY.
Regards,
Vicky
Hi
We use MDG 6.1. Sometimes we are facing issue of only Business Partner created and Customer not at all created. This is happening after change request is approved and activated. So we are forced to created customer again. I am unable replicate this error and hence could not find any solution.
I see in transaction code /SAPPO/PPO3 and log display as below :
Customer XXXXXX: Mandatory partner role is missing for sales area XXXX XX XX
During debugging I saw that system correctly populating mandatory partners. But not sure what is happening during synchronization phase (CVI process in background during activation of business partner and customer).
I implemented note 2178160 but it didn't help.
If any one had this issue, please help me.
Hi Friends,
I am trying to copy from one material to another material. But it is not copying all the fields. Only few fields it is copying. How to configure to copy all the data..?
Regards,
Lakshmi
Dear All,
Can anyone guide me if a change request is created or a master data record is created in MDG if there is P2P interface between SLM & MDG. To be precise, If someone is promoted to a supplier after approval in SLM and if the SLM system is connected to a MDG system, will it create a change request in MDG or a Master data record in MDG, If a master data record is created will it be a BP (BUT000) or a LFA1 record or both.
Any kind of information in this record will be sincerely appreciated. Below url for referance.
Managing Supplier Master Data with Master Data Governance - Technical Concepts - SAP Library
Thanks & Regards.
Tushar.
Hi Everyone,
Do we have any method to read class and characteristics values from staging tables?
any sample code.....
Regards,
Bhuvaneswari
Hi,
We are using Rule Based Workflow and have added a new Custom Step.
This step has 3 actions - Approve, Reject and Withdraw.
Each action goes to a new step.
Please guide how I can achieve the two requirements.
Thanks,
Charan.
We have extended the MM data model with a flex entity with attributes, which we do not need in the active area and now we want to have these attributes
available in the MDG Search too.
We proceeded as described in the document "How To... Master Data Governance for Material Extend Search" on http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-29002.
Now we are at step 6.6.1.1 Enhance Template MATERIAL and we try to update the note for the flex entity in the search model (Define Model MATERIAL of Software Component SAP_APPL via transaction ESH_COCKPIT).
What we did step by step:
When pressing "Update Node > Update" nothing happens. The system reports "Node ZZ1 has been updated successfully" but the new attributes are not visible in the "details: attributes of node" list below.
I have to say that the note is already there with a couple of attributes and those old attributes are already visible in the search model.
Now we have added some additional attributes in the data model.
When I try to delete the note in the search model and create it again, the system reports "Data source ZZ1 does not exist or is inactive", although I've entered the identical data source of the deleted note again.
Any ideas why the node update does not discover the new attributes?
Thanks & Regards,
Matthias
Hi Gurus,
We are using MDG 6.0 for our customer. There was a requirement to add more attributes from Costing View; Work Scheduling View; Foreign Trade Export and Import view of material master to MDG Data Model.
After adding we came across an issue with "Material Orgin" field, though we have not maintained the accounting or costing view in MDG CR system triggers message to maintain "Material Origin" field, raised OSS message and reply was to make the material origin field option in ECC or maintain it.
Before adding these attributes system never asked to maintain this field. Can you advise removing which fields from the data model we can ensure this message is not triggered. Following is the list of fields from costing view added to data model.
HRKFT | Origin Group as Subdivision of Cost Element |
KOSGR | Costing | Overhead Group |
EKALR Material Is Costed with Quantity Structure
PPRDZ Period of Future Standard Cost Estimate
PDATZ Fiscal Year of Future Standard Cost Estimate
LFMON Current period (posting period)
ZPLPR Future Planned Price
NCOST Do Not Cost
AWSLS Variance Key
FVIDK Production Version To Be Costed
LOSGR | Lot | Size for Product Costing |
I have already removed Lot Size for Product Costing; Future planned price and also price control, but still issue is not resolved.
Do you suggest any other alternative.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rama
Hello,
In Create Mode CR, user can select the already existing keys and on the processing screen, he can change the corresponding values of other fields.
But I was assuming this would be Change mode functionality, how is it allowed in Create mode?
How to restrict user from selecting already existing keys?
As these are key fields, they are not processed on further screen if I enable duplicate checks there. Need to check on Initial screen, how?
Cheers
Hello,
Is it possible to start the CR from an Automated process, I mean the CR creation step to be Automated?
Cheers
Hello
When I am using the UI applications, sometimes the next step screen does not load and is blank.
When you re-open the application, you find it locked.
I know how to unlock and continue, but is there a way to avoid these blank screens?
Cheers
Hi Experts,
I'm implementing MDGC7 in a demo system. I would like to use BRF rules to route my workflow and to understand how exatly BRF and workflow are tied together. I have set up my single value, user agent and non-user agent decision tables as it is written here: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1083c36f-a765-3110-f8a5-d03be6b06d0e?QuickLink=index&….
However, after submitting my CR for the first time, I cannot find the CR in the MDG menu option "change request and documents"-->"to be processed by me". It's empty.
This is how my single value dec. table is set. According to this my WF should bes set to 'step 10' and 'status 02'.
The cond. alias is REV, so this is how my user agent decision table is set:
When I check my WF log, I suppose that the agent determination should be done in the "Agent and route finder" step:
And in the container of this step I have the correct value:
Maybe it get lost somehow after the processing of the next steps? Could someone help me how can I find the reason of the error?
Thank you in advance,
Tamas
Hi Team,
I am looking for assigning a Class/Characteristics to Vendors in MDGS but I am not sure if this can be done using standard MDG data model.
I know it can be done for MDG-M.
Can it be done using extension scenario.
When I checked all the data models for BP, MDGS , MDGM all the data model does not have classification fields but MDG-M comes with standard classification.
Does MDG-S or MDG-BP comes with standard Classification assignment?
If no how can we achieve this functionality?
Regards
Suds
Hi ,
I am initializing the AD_POSTAL entity for business partner using BAdI IF_EX_USMD_RULE_SERVICE2~DERIVE method.
This Badi method gets triggered when the maintenance window is loaded for the first time but the default values for attributes of AD_Postal entity which I am setting using the Badi is not reflected on the UI .
However when I press the return key or try to set manually for one of the attributes of AD_POSTAL entity all the default values which has been set earlier using the Badi gets updated on the UI .
I am facing the same issue even when i tried updating this entity with the enhancement in feeder class.
Any clue regarding this Issue .
Here is my code :
**** *******************************************
Creating Data Reference for AD_POSTAL
**** *******************************************
**** Initializing attributes of AD_POSTAL entity ***********************************************************************************
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'BP_HEADER' of structure <ls_data_ad_postal_new> to <lv_system_new>.
<lv_system_new> = lv_bp_header.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'ADDRNO' of structure <ls_data_ad_postal_new> to <lv_system_new>.
<lv_system_new> = gs_temp_key_addr. " Address Number Generated from FM NUMBER_GET_NEXT
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'REF_POSTA' of structure <ls_data_ad_postal_new> to <lv_system_new>.
<lv_system_new> = 'DE'.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'city1' of structure <ls_data_ad_postal_new> to <lv_system_new>.
<lv_system_new> = 'Berlin'.
***********************************************************************************
INSERT <ls_data_ad_postal_new> INTO TABLE <lt_data_ad_postal_new>.
CREATE DATA lr_data_struc LIKE LINE OF <lt_data_ad_postal_new>.
lo_struct_data ?= cl_abap_structdescr=>describe_by_data_ref( p_data_ref = lr_data_struc ).
CLEAR: lt_attribute.
LOOP AT lo_struct_data->components ASSIGNING <lf_component>.
INSERT <lf_component>-name INTO TABLE lt_attribute.
ENDLOOP.
"************************write the data************************************************
TRY.
io_write_data->write_data(
EXPORTING
i_entity = 'AD_POSTAL'
it_attribute = lt_attribute
it_data = <lt_data_ad_postal_new> ).
CATCH cx_usmd_write_error. " Error During Write Access RETURN.
ENDTRY.
Regards,
Vicky
Hi
We use MDG 6.1. Sometimes we are facing issue of only Business Partner created and Customer not at all created. This is happening after change request is approved and activated. So we are forced to created customer again. I am unable replicate this error and hence could not find any solution.
I see in transaction code /SAPPO/PPO3 and log display as below :
Customer XXXXXX: Mandatory partner role is missing for sales area XXXX XX XX
During debugging I saw that system correctly populating mandatory partners. But not sure what is happening during synchronization phase (CVI process in background during activation of business partner and customer).
I implemented note 2178160 but it didn't help.
If any one had this issue, please help me.
HI All,
we are proposing SAP PLM and MDG8 to one of our customer.
please clarify
1.Is the integration supported out of the box(I know till MDG7, integration is using consulting solution)
2.Anybody has before implemented this combination of solution?
3.PLM requires lot of fields which are not there in standard MDG-M,how to handle this scenario?
Thanks,
Tuhin